Hatred

Truth exists independently from the medium that proclaims it. A logical conclusion, whether from the mouth of a fool or a genius, by definition, owes nothing to that which publicizes it. Two plus two equals four. This equation, if uttered by a saint, is true. If stated by a convicted murder, it is true. Dumb-smart. Evil-good. Talented-incompetent. It always is true: 2+2=4.

Seems obvious, yet it isn't, at least not anymore. People ignore the truth for a plethora of reasons; however, here I want to specifically explore one that blinds millions: the polarizing hatred of an individual or an entity that disables one's intellect.

Before casting stones, I have looked inward for potential prejudices, for any selective conclusions. I have searched for beliefs based not on sound reasoning, but formed as a reaction. Have there been instances where someone said "zig" so I said "zag"? A foe suggested night so I chose day? Have I ever, because of my feelings toward an individual or a personality, flavored my ideologies with my distaste for another's views.

Is this making sense? Maybe not, and that is the problem. It doesn't make sense, and I, at this point, am not able to relate. Especially recently, I have experienced and observed instances where a person or people ride a merry-go-round of thoughts. In one context, a discussion leads one to avow conservative principles: those of liberty, and individual rights. Point to a recent news story that reveals the communist leanings of a newly appointed "Czar" and hear a friend claim disapproval. Mention that Fox News reported the story, and see him defend the appointment with religious zeal.

Call attention to specific Orwellian tenets of the recent health care bill, and the room fills with rage. Reveal that one first heard about these oversteps of power from Glenn Beck and find the same room filled with Barack Obama sycophants.

I don't hate Barack Obama. I disagree with just about every one of his policies. If he were to announce tomorrow that, instead of more government intrusions, he had decided to pursue tax breaks for charitable contributions, I would cheer from the rooftop. His approval ratings, his electability are not my concern. I want what is right. How he would benefit or suffer is not on the radar.

How can we develop good and just policies when so many people color their perceptions with emotional reactions to the person? Truth is not affected by those who report if or subscribe to it; however, when a simple emotional appeal can send so many astray, vertigo is nearly unavoidable for those who think.